Home  ›  What Mutant Sequence Can Result From Spontaneous Depurination in This Stretch of Dna

What Mutant Sequence Can Result From Spontaneous Depurination in This Stretch of Dna

Written By Wednesday, February 16, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Mutagenesis is a process past which the genetic information of an organism is changed by the production of a mutation. It may occur spontaneously in nature, or as a result of exposure to mutagens. Information technology tin also be achieved experimentally using laboratory procedures. A mutagen is a mutation-causing agent, exist information technology chemic or physical, which results in an increased rate of mutations in an organism's genetic code. In nature mutagenesis tin lead to cancer and various heritable diseases, only it is also a driving force of evolution. Mutagenesis as a science was developed based on piece of work done by Hermann Muller, Charlotte Auerbach and J. Yard. Robson in the first one-half of the 20th century.[1]

History [edit]

DNA may be modified, either naturally or artificially, past a number of concrete, chemical and biological agents, resulting in mutations. Hermann Muller constitute that "high temperatures" have the ability to mutate genes in the early 1920s,[2] and in 1927, demonstrated a causal link to mutation upon experimenting with an ten-ray machine, noting phylogenetic changes when irradiating fruit flies with relatively loftier dose of X-rays.[3] [4] Muller observed a number of chromosome rearrangements in his experiments, and suggested mutation as a cause of cancer.[5] [6] The association of exposure to radiation and cancer had been observed as early as 1902, six years after the discovery of X-ray by Wilhelm Röntgen, and the discovery of radioactive decay by Henri Becquerel.[vii] Lewis Stadler, Muller's contemporary, likewise showed the effect of 10-rays on mutations in barley in 1928, and of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on maize in 1936.[8] In 1940s, Charlotte Auerbach and J. Thousand. Robson found that mustard gas can as well crusade mutations in fruit flies.[9]

While changes to the chromosome caused by X-ray and mustard gas were readily appreciable to early researchers, other changes to the DNA induced by other mutagens were not and so easily observable; the machinery by which they occur may be complex, and take longer to unravel. For example, soot was suggested to be a cause of cancer as early as 1775,[ten] and coal tar was demonstrated to cause cancer in 1915.[eleven] The chemicals involved in both were later shown to be polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).[12] PAHs by themselves are not carcinogenic, and it was proposed in 1950 that the carcinogenic forms of PAHs are the oxides produced as metabolites from cellular processes.[13] The metabolic procedure was identified in 1960s equally catalysis past cytochrome P450, which produces reactive species that tin collaborate with the Deoxyribonucleic acid to course adducts, or product molecules resulting from the reaction of DNA and, in this case, cytochrome P450;[xiv] [15] the machinery by which the PAH adducts give rise to mutation, however, is nevertheless under investigation.

Distinction between a mutation and DNA damage [edit]

DNA damage is an aberrant alteration in the construction of Deoxyribonucleic acid that cannot, itself, exist replicated when DNA replicates. In contrast, a mutation is a change in the nucleic acid sequence that can be replicated; hence, a mutation can be inherited from 1 generation to the adjacent. Harm can occur from chemical addition (adduct), or structural disruption to a base of Dna (creating an abnormal nucleotide or nucleotide fragment), or a interruption in i or both DNA strands. Such Deoxyribonucleic acid damage may upshot in mutation. When Deoxyribonucleic acid containing damage is replicated, an incorrect base may be inserted in the new complementary strand as information technology is existence synthesized (meet DNA repair § Translesion synthesis). The wrong insertion in the new strand will occur opposite the damaged site in the template strand, and this incorrect insertion can become a mutation (i.e. a changed base pair) in the side by side round of replication. Furthermore, double-strand breaks in Deoxyribonucleic acid may be repaired by an inaccurate repair process, non-homologous end joining, which produces mutations. Mutations can commonly exist avoided if accurate Deoxyribonucleic acid repair systems recognize DNA damage and repair information technology prior to completion of the next round of replication. At to the lowest degree 169 enzymes are either straight employed in Dna repair or influence Deoxyribonucleic acid repair processes. Of these, 83 are directly employed in the 5 types of Deoxyribonucleic acid repair processes indicated in the nautical chart shown in the commodity Deoxyribonucleic acid repair.

Mammalian nuclear Dna may sustain more than than 60,000 impairment episodes per cell per solar day, as listed with references in Deoxyribonucleic acid damage (naturally occurring). If left uncorrected, these adducts, later misreplication by the damaged sites, can give ascension to mutations. In nature, the mutations that arise may exist beneficial or deleterious—this is the driving forcefulness of evolution. An organism may acquire new traits through genetic mutation, just mutation may also result in impaired role of the genes and, in severe cases, causes the death of the organism. Mutation is as well a major source for acquisition of resistance to antibiotics in leaner, and to antifungal agents in yeasts and molds.[16] [17] In a laboratory setting, mutagenesis is a useful technique for generating mutations that allows the functions of genes and factor products to be examined in detail, producing proteins with improved characteristics or novel functions, as well as mutant strains with useful backdrop. Initially, the ability of radiation and chemical mutagens to cause mutation was exploited to generate random mutations, but later techniques were developed to introduce specific mutations.

In humans, an average of sixty new mutations are transmitted from parent to offspring. Man males, even so, tend to pass on more mutations depending on their age, transmitting an average of ii new mutations to their progeny with every additional year of their age.[18] [19]

Mechanisms [edit]

Mutagenesis may occur endogenously (e.chiliad. spontaneous hydrolysis), through normal cellular processes that can generate reactive oxygen species and Dna adducts, or through error in DNA replication and repair.[20] Mutagenesis may also occur every bit a upshot of the presence of environmental mutagens that induce changes to an organism's DNA. The mechanism past which mutation occurs varies according to the mutagen, or the causative amanuensis, involved. Most mutagens act either directly, or indirectly via mutagenic metabolites, on an organism'southward DNA, producing lesions. Some mutagens, nevertheless, may affect the replication or chromosomal partition mechanism, and other cellular processes.

Mutagenesis may also be self-induced past unicellular organisms when environmental conditions are restrictive to the organism'south growth, such equally bacteria growing in the presence of antibiotics, yeast growing in the presence of an antifungal agent, or other unicellular organisms growing in an environment lacking in an essential food [21] [22] [23]

Many chemical mutagens crave biological activation to become mutagenic. An important grouping of enzymes involved in the generation of mutagenic metabolites is cytochrome P450.[24] Other enzymes that may also produce mutagenic metabolites include glutathione S-transferase and microsomal epoxide hydrolase. Mutagens that are not mutagenic past themselves but require biological activation are chosen promutagens.

While most mutagens produce furnishings that ultimately result in errors in replication, for case creating adducts that interfere with replication, some mutagens may directly bear on the replication process or reduce its fidelity. Base analog such every bit 5-bromouracil may substitute for thymine in replication. Metals such as cadmium, chromium, and nickel tin increase mutagenesis in a number of ways in addition to directly DNA damage, for example reducing the ability to repair errors, likewise as producing epigenetic changes.[25]

Mutations often arise as a result of bug acquired by DNA lesions during replication, resulting in errors in replication. In bacteria, extensive damage to DNA due to mutagens results in single-stranded Deoxyribonucleic acid gaps during replication. This induces the SOS response, an emergency repair process that is also error-prone, thereby generating mutations. In mammalian cells, stalling of replication at damaged sites induces a number of rescue mechanisms that assistance featherbed Deoxyribonucleic acid lesions, yet, this may also issue in errors. The Y family unit of DNA polymerases specializes in Deoxyribonucleic acid lesion featherbed in a process termed translesion synthesis (TLS) whereby these lesion-featherbed polymerases replace the stalled high-fidelity replicative DNA polymerase, transit the lesion and extend the Dna until the lesion has been passed so that normal replication can resume; these processes may be error-prone or mistake-gratis.

DNA harm and spontaneous mutation [edit]

The number of Deoxyribonucleic acid damage episodes occurring in a mammalian cell per twenty-four hour period is high (more than 60,000 per twenty-four hour period). Frequent occurrence of Deoxyribonucleic acid damage is likely a problem for all DNA- containing organisms, and the need to cope with Deoxyribonucleic acid damage and minimize their deleterious effects is likely a fundamental trouble for life.[ citation needed ]

Most spontaneous mutations likely ascend from error-prone trans-lesion synthesis by a Dna damage site in the template strand during Deoxyribonucleic acid replication. This procedure can overcome potentially lethal blockages, but at the cost of introducing inaccuracies in girl Deoxyribonucleic acid. The causal relationship of Dna impairment to spontaneous mutation is illustrated past aerobically growing E. coli bacteria, in which 89% of spontaneously occurring base of operations exchange mutations are caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced Deoxyribonucleic acid damage.[26] In yeast, more than 60% of spontaneous single-base pair substitutions and deletions are likely caused by trans-lesion synthesis.[27]

An additional significant source of mutations in eukaryotes is the inaccurate Deoxyribonucleic acid repair process not-homologous end joining, that is often employed in repair of double strand breaks.[28]

In general, information technology appears that the main underlying cause of spontaneous mutation is error-prone trans-lesion synthesis during DNA replication and that the mistake-decumbent non-homologous end-joining repair pathway may also be an of import correspondent in eukaryotes.

Spontaneous hydrolysis [edit]

DNA is not entirely stable in aqueous solution, and depurination of the DNA can occur. Under physiological conditions the glycosidic bond may be hydrolyzed spontaneously and 10,000 purine sites in Deoxyribonucleic acid are estimated to be depurinated each twenty-four hour period in a cell.[twenty] Numerous DNA repair pathways exist for DNA; however, if the apurinic site is not repaired, misincorporation of nucleotides may occur during replication. Adenine is preferentially incorporated by Deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases in an apurinic site.

Cytidine may also become deaminated to uridine at one v-hundredth of the rate of depurination and can outcome in 1000 to A transition. Eukaryotic cells also contain 5-methylcytosine, thought to exist involved in the control of cistron transcription, which tin become deaminated into thymine.

Tautomerism [edit]

Tautomerization is the process by which compounds spontaneously rearrange themselves to presume their structural isomer forms. For example, the keto (C=O) forms of guanine and thymine tin can rearrange into their rare enol (-OH) forms, while the amino (-NH2 ) forms of adenine and cytosine can outcome in the rarer imino (=NH) forms. In Dna replication, tautomerization alters the base of operations-pairing sites and can cause the improper pairing of nucleic acid bases.[29]

Modification of bases [edit]

Bases may exist modified endogenously past normal cellular molecules. For example, DNA may exist methylated by Southward-adenosylmethionine, thus altering the expression of the marked gene without incurring a mutation to the Deoxyribonucleic acid sequence itself. Histone modification is a related procedure in which the histone proteins effectually which Deoxyribonucleic acid coils can be similarly modified via methylation, phosphorylation, or acetylation; these modifications may deed to alter factor expression of the local DNA, and may also act to denote locations of damaged Dna in need of repair. Dna may besides be glycosylated past reducing sugars.

Many compounds, such as PAHs, effluvious amines, aflatoxin and pyrrolizidine alkaloids, may form reactive oxygen species catalyzed by cytochrome P450. These metabolites grade adducts with the DNA, which can crusade errors in replication, and the bulky aromatic adducts may course stable intercalation between bases and block replication. The adducts may besides induce conformational changes in the Dna. Some adducts may also result in the depurination of the Dna;[30] it is, withal, uncertain how meaning such depurination as caused by the adducts is in generating mutation.

Alkylation and arylation of bases can cause errors in replication. Some alkylating agents such as Northward-Nitrosamines may require the catalytic reaction of cytochrome-P450 for the formation of a reactive alkyl cation. Nseven and O6 of guanine and the Nthree and Nseven of adenine are most susceptible to assail. Northvii-guanine adducts form the bulk of DNA adducts, but they appear to be non-mutagenic. Alkylation at O6 of guanine, yet, is harmful because excision repair of O6-adduct of guanine may exist poor in some tissues such every bit the brain.[31] The O6 methylation of guanine can result in Thou to A transition, while O4-methylthymine can exist mispaired with guanine. The type of the mutation generated, nonetheless, may exist dependent on the size and blazon of the adduct besides every bit the DNA sequence.[32]

Ionizing radiation and reactive oxygen species often oxidize guanine to produce 8-oxoguanine.

Arrows indicates chromosomal breakages due to Dna damage

Courage damage [edit]

Ionizing radiation may produce highly reactive free radicals that can break the bonds in the Dna. Double-stranded breakages are peculiarly damaging and hard to repair, producing translocation and deletion of part of a chromosome. Alkylating agents like mustard gas may also crusade breakages in the Dna backbone. Oxidative stress may also generate highly reactive oxygen species that can harm Dna. Incorrect repair of other damage induced past the highly reactive species can besides lead to mutations.

Crosslinking [edit]

Covalent bonds between the bases of nucleotides in DNA, be they in the same strand or opposing strands, is referred to as crosslinking of DNA; crosslinking of DNA may affect both the replication and the transcription of Deoxyribonucleic acid, and it may be caused past exposure to a variety of agents. Some naturally occurring chemicals may also promote crosslinking, such equally psoralens after activation by UV radiation, and nitrous acid. Interstrand cantankerous-linking (between ii strands) causes more damage, as information technology blocks replication and transcription and can cause chromosomal breakages and rearrangements. Some crosslinkers such every bit cyclophosphamide, mitomycin C and cisplatin are used as anticancer chemotherapeutic because of their loftier caste of toxicity to proliferating cells.

Dimerization [edit]

Dimerization consists of the bonding of two monomers to form an oligomer, such as the formation of pyrimidine dimers equally a result of exposure to UV radiations, which promotes the formation of a cyclobutyl ring between adjacent thymines in Deoxyribonucleic acid.[33] In human skin cells, thousands of dimers may be formed in a twenty-four hour period due to normal exposure to sunlight. DNA polymerase η may help bypass these lesions in an mistake-free style;[34] withal, individuals with defective DNA repair role, such as sufferers of xeroderma pigmentosum, are sensitive to sunlight and may exist prone to peel cancer.

Ethidium intercalated between two adenine-thymine base pairs.

Intercalation between bases [edit]

The planar structure of chemicals such as ethidium bromide and proflavine allows them to insert between bases in Dna. This insert causes the Dna's backbone to stretch and makes slippage in Dna during replication more likely to occur since the bonding between the strands is made less stable by the stretching. Forward slippage volition result in deletion mutation, while reverse slippage volition result in an insertion mutation. Also, the intercalation into Dna of anthracyclines such equally daunorubicin and doxorubicin interferes with the functioning of the enzyme topoisomerase 2, blocking replication as well as causing mitotic homologous recombination.

Insertional mutagenesis [edit]

Transposons and viruses may insert Deoxyribonucleic acid sequences into coding regions or functional elements of a gene and upshot in inactivation of the gene.

Adaptive mutagenesis mechanisms [edit]

Adaptive mutagenesis has been defined as mutagenesis mechanisms that enable an organism to adjust to an environmental stress. Since the variety of environmental stresses is very broad, the mechanisms that enable information technology are also quite wide, as far as inquiry on the field has shown. For instance, in leaner, while modulation of the SOS response and endogenous prophage Dna synthesis has been shown to increase Acinetobacter baumannii resistance to ciprofloxacin.[16] Resistance mechanisms are presumed to exist linked to chromosomal mutation untransferable via horizontal gene transfer in some members of family Enterobacteriaceae, such as E. coli, Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp.[35] Chromosomal events, specially gene amplification, seem as well to be relevant to this adaptive mutagenesis in bacteria.[36]

Inquiry in eukaryotic cells is much scarcer, but chromosomal events seem too to exist rather relevant: while an ectopic intrachromosomal recombination has been reported to be involved in conquering of resistance to v-fluorocytosine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,[17] genome duplications have been found to confer resistance in S. cerevisiae to food-poor environments.[21] [37] [38]

Laboratory Applications [edit]

In the laboratory, mutagenesis is a technique by which DNA mutations are deliberately engineered to produce mutant genes, proteins, or strains of organisms. Various constituents of a gene, such equally its command elements and its gene product, may be mutated and then that the function of a gene or protein tin can be examined in detail. The mutation may also produce mutant proteins with altered backdrop, or enhanced or novel functions that may bear witness to exist of use commercially. Mutant strains of organisms that have practical applications, or allow the molecular basis of item cell role to exist investigated, may also be produced.

Early on methods of mutagenesis produced entirely random mutations; nevertheless, modern methods of mutagenesis are capable of producing site-specific mutations. Modernistic laboratory techniques used to generate these mutations include:

  • Directed mutagenesis
  • Site-directed mutagenesis/ PCR mutagenesis
  • Insertional mutagenesis
  • Signature tagged mutagenesis
  • Transposon mutagenesis
  • Sequence saturation mutagenesis

See also [edit]

  • Carcinogenesis
  • Deoxyribonucleic acid damage (naturally occurring)
  • Dna repair
  • Mutagen
  • Mutation
  • Mutation convenance
  • Mutation rate
  • Transfection

References [edit]

  1. ^ Beale, One thousand. (1993). "The Discovery of Mustard Gas Mutagenesis by Auerbach and Robson in 1941". Genetics. 134 (2): 393–399. doi:10.1093/genetics/134.2.393. PMC1205483. PMID 8325476.
  2. ^ Kevin M. Gleason Published: 2017-03-07. "Hermann Joseph Muller's Study of X-rays equally a Mutagen, (1926-1927)".
  3. ^ "Genetics and Genomics Timeline 1927 Hermann J. Muller (1890-1967) demonstrates that X rays tin induce mutations".
  4. ^ Muller, H. J. (1927). "Artificial Transmutation of the Gene" (PDF). Science. 66 (1699): 84–87. Bibcode:1927Sci....66...84M. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.66.1699.84. PMID 17802387.
  5. ^ Crow, J. F.; Abrahamson, S. (1997). "Seventy Years Ago: Mutation Becomes Experimental". Genetics. 147 (4): 1491–1496. doi:ten.1093/genetics/147.4.1491. PMC1208325. PMID 9409815.
  6. ^ Calabrese, E. J. (thirty June 2011). "Muller's Nobel lecture on dose–response for ionizing radiations:ideology or science?" (PDF). Archives of Toxicology. 85 (four): 1495–1498. doi:ten.1007/s00204-011-0728-8. PMID 21717110. S2CID 4708210. Retrieved 30 December 2011.
  7. ^ Ronald 50. Kathren (December 2002). "Historical Evolution of the Linear Nonthreshold Dose-Response Model as Applied to Radiation". University of New Hampshire Law Review. 1 (1).
  8. ^ Stadler, L. J.; G. F. Sprague (1936-x-15). "Genetic Effects of Ultra-Violet Radiation in Maize. I. Unfiltered Radiation" (PDF). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United states of americaA. 22 (10): 572–8. Bibcode:1936PNAS...22..572S. doi:10.1073/pnas.22.10.572. PMC1076819. PMID 16588111. Retrieved 2007-x-11 .
  9. ^ Auerbach, C.; Robson, J.M.; Carr, J.G. (March 1947). "Chemical Production of Mutations". Science. 105 (2723): 243–7. Bibcode:1947Sci...105..243A. doi:ten.1126/science.105.2723.243. PMID 17769478.
  10. ^ Brown, J. R.; Thornton, J. Fifty. (1957). "Percivall Pott (1714-1788) and Chimney Sweepers' Cancer of the Scrotum". British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 14 (ane): 68–seventy. doi:10.1136/oem.xiv.ane.68. PMC1037746. PMID 13396156.
  11. ^ Yamagawa K, Ichikawa K (1915). "Experimentelle Studie ueber dice Pathogenese der Epithel geschwuelste". Mitteilungen aus der Medizinischen Fakultät der Kaiserlichen Universität zu Tokyo. xv: 295–344.
  12. ^ Luch, Andreas (2005). "Nature and Nurture — Lessons from Chemical Carcinogenesis: Chemical Carcinogens — From By to Nowadays". Medscape.
  13. ^ Boyland E (1950). "The biological significance of metabolism of polycyclic compounds". Biochemical Gild Symposium. 5: forty–54. ISSN 0067-8694. OCLC 216723160.
  14. ^ Omura, T.; Sato, R. (1962). "A new cytochrome in liver microsomes". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 237 (4): 1375–1376. doi:x.1016/S0021-9258(18)60338-2. PMID 14482007.
  15. ^ Conney, A. H. (1982). "Induction of microsomal enzymes past foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic effluvious hydrocarbons: Grand. H. A. Clowes Memorial Lecture". Cancer Research. 42 (12): 4875–4917. PMID 6814745.
  16. ^ a b Geisinger, Edward; Vargas-Cuebas, Germán; Mortman, Nadav J.; Syal, Sapna; Dai, Yunfei; Wainwright, Elizabeth L.; Lazinski, David; Woods, Stephen; Zhu, Zeyu (2019-06-11). Miller, Samuel I. (ed.). "The Landscape of Phenotypic and Transcriptional Responses to Ciprofloxacin in Acinetobacter baumannii : Acquired Resistance Alleles Modulate Drug-Induced SOS Response and Prophage Replication". mBio. 10 (3). doi:x.1128/mBio.01127-19. ISSN 2150-7511. PMC6561030. PMID 31186328.
  17. ^ a b Quinto-Alemany, David; Canerina-Amaro, Ana; Hernández-Abad, Luís G.; Machín, Félix; Romesberg, Floyd E.; Gil-Lamaignere, Cristina (2012-07-31). Sturtevant, Joy (ed.). "Yeasts Acquire Resistance Secondary to Antifungal Drug Treatment past Adaptive Mutagenesis". PLOS One. 7 (7): e42279. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...742279Q. doi:x.1371/journal.pone.0042279. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC3409178. PMID 22860105.
  18. ^ Jha, Alok (22 August 2012). "Older fathers pass on more genetic mutations, study shows". The Guardian.
  19. ^ Kong, A.; Frigge, Chiliad. L.; Masson, Thou.; Besenbacher, South.; Sulem, P.; Magnusson, G.; Gudjonsson, S. A.; Sigurdsson, A.; Jonasdottir, A.; Jonasdottir, A.; Wong, W. S.; Sigurdsson, Grand.; Walters, G. B.; Steinberg, South.; Helgason, H.; Thorleifsson, Chiliad.; Gudbjartsson, D. F.; Helgason, A.; Magnusson, O. T.; Thorsteinsdottir, U.; Stefansson, 1000. (2012). "Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk". Nature. 488 (7412): 471–475. Bibcode:2012Natur.488..471K. doi:ten.1038/nature11396. PMC3548427. PMID 22914163.
  20. ^ a b Loeb, 50. A. (1989). "Endogenous carcinogenesis: Molecular oncology into the twenty-kickoff century--presidential address" (PDF). Cancer Enquiry. 49 (twenty): 5489–5496. PMID 2676144.
  21. ^ a b Heidenreich, Erich (January 2007). "Adaptive Mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 42 (4): 285–311. doi:10.1080/10409230701507773. ISSN 1040-9238. PMID 17687670. S2CID 11594730.
  22. ^ Quinto-Alemany, David; Canerina-Amaro, Ana; Hernández-Abad, Luís Thousand.; Machín, Félix; Romesberg, Floyd E.; Gil-Lamaignere, Cristina (2012-07-31). Sturtevant, Joy (ed.). "Yeasts Acquire Resistance Secondary to Antifungal Drug Treatment past Adaptive Mutagenesis". PLOS I. seven (7): e42279. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...742279Q. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042279. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC3409178. PMID 22860105.
  23. ^ Aghapour, Zahra; Gholizadeh, Pourya; Ganbarov, Khudaverdi; bialvaei, Abed Zahedi; Mahmood, Suhad Saad; Tanomand, Asghar; Yousefi, Mehdi; Asgharzadeh, Mohammad; Yousefi, Bahman (April 2019). "Molecular mechanisms related to colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae". Infection and Drug Resistance. 12: 965–975. doi:10.2147/idr.s199844. PMC6519339. PMID 31190901.
  24. ^ Trevor M. Penning (2011). Chemical Carcinogenesis (Current Cancer Research). Springer. ISBN978-1617379949.
  25. ^ Salnikow Thou, Zhitkovich (January 2008). "Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium". Chemical Research in Toxicology. 21 (ane): 28–44. doi:10.1021/tx700198a. PMC2602826. PMID 17970581.
  26. ^ Sakai A, Nakanishi M, Yoshiyama Grand, Maki H (July 2006). "Impact of reactive oxygen species on spontaneous mutagenesis in Escherichia coli". Genes Cells. 11 (seven): 767–78. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00982.x. PMID 16824196. S2CID 1365658.
  27. ^ Kunz BA, Ramachandran Thou, Vonarx EJ (April 1998). "DNA sequence analysis of spontaneous mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae". Genetics. 148 (4): 1491–505. doi:x.1093/genetics/148.4.1491. PMC1460101. PMID 9560369.
  28. ^ Huertas P (January 2010). "Dna resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to ready the break". Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17 (one): 11–6. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1710. PMC2850169. PMID 20051983.
  29. ^ Sinden, Richard R. (1994). DNA Structure and Function. Academic Printing. pp. 17–twenty. ISBN978-0126457506.
  30. ^ Melendez-Colon, 5. J.; Smith, C. A.; Seidel, A.; Luch, A.; Platt, Thousand. L.; Baird, W. Grand. (1997). "Germination of stable adducts and absence of depurinating Dna adducts in cells and DNA treated with the potent carcinogen dibenzoa, lpyrene or its diol epoxides". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the The states of America. 94 (25): 13542–13547. Bibcode:1997PNAS...9413542M. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13542. PMC28342. PMID 9391062.
  31. ^ Boysen, M.; Pachkowski, B. F.; Nakamura, J.; Swenberg, J. A. (2009). "The Formation and Biological Significance of N7-Guanine Adducts". Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 678 (2): 76–94. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.05.006. PMC2739241. PMID 19465146.
  32. ^ Loechler, E. L. (1996). "The role of adduct site-specific mutagenesis in understanding how carcinogen-Deoxyribonucleic acid adducts cause mutations: Perspective, prospects and problems". Carcinogenesis. 17 (v): 895–902. doi:10.1093/carcin/17.5.895. PMID 8640935.
  33. ^ Setlow, R. B. (1966). "Cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in polynucleotides". Scientific discipline. 153 (734): 379–386. Bibcode:1966Sci...153..379S. doi:10.1126/science.153.3734.379. PMID 5328566. S2CID 11210761.
  34. ^ Broyde, South.; Patel, D. J. (2010). "Deoxyribonucleic acid repair: How to accurately bypass damage". Nature. 465 (7301): 1023–1024. Bibcode:2010Natur.465.1023B. doi:ten.1038/4651023a. PMC4986998. PMID 20577203.
  35. ^ Aghapour, Zahra; Gholizadeh, Pourya; Ganbarov, Khudaverdi; bialvaei, Abed Zahedi; Mahmood, Suhad Saad; Tanomand, Asghar; Yousefi, Mehdi; Asgharzadeh, Mohammad; Yousefi, Bahman (April 2019). "Molecular mechanisms related to colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae". Infection and Drug Resistance. 12: 965–975. doi:ten.2147/idr.s199844. PMC6519339. PMID 31190901.
  36. ^ Hersh, Megan North; Ponder, Rebecca Thousand; Hastings, P.J; Rosenberg, Susan M (June 2004). "Adaptive mutation and distension in Escherichia coli: two pathways of genome adaptation nether stress". Enquiry in Microbiology. 155 (5): 352–359. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.020. PMID 15207867.
  37. ^ Longerich, South.; Galloway, A. M.; Harris, R. Due south.; Wong, C.; Rosenberg, Due south. K. (1995-12-19). "Adaptive mutation sequences reproduced by mismatch repair deficiency". Proceedings of the National University of Sciences. 92 (26): 12017–12020. Bibcode:1995PNAS...9212017L. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.26.12017. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC40287. PMID 8618835.
  38. ^ Rosenberg, Susan Yard.; Fitzgerald, Devon M. (2019-04-01). "What is mutation? A chapter in the serial: How microbes "jeopardize" the modern synthesis". PLOS Genetics. 15 (4): e1007995. doi:x.1371/journal.pgen.1007995. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC6443146. PMID 30933985.

butlersustrian98.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutagenesis

0 Response to "What Mutant Sequence Can Result From Spontaneous Depurination in This Stretch of Dna"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel